READ THE WHARTON ARTICLE FIRST...
I've posted link to an interesting article here that I came across this week from
the Wharton Business School newsletters. It talks about the future
of media - "Amateurs" vs. "Experts" websites, OR,
the User-Generated Content (UGC), such as My Space, You Tube,
or blogs, vs traditional media powerhouses like the New York Times.
One cannot disregard one over the other for a number of issues -
credibility, cost-efficiency, or unique exposure to personal POV's...etc.
The trend now seems to be moving towards a hybrid approach
that embraces both professional and amateur content. The million-dollar
question for the emerging UGC is on its business model. Yes, the Internet
advertising market has grown considerably compared to 10 years ago, but
is that a sustainable business model? Lots of media experts do not think so.
I've met at least three aspiring entrepreneurs in the last 12 months who
were interested in starting a sport-themed social networking website. They all
involved some sort of UGC, so the driving traffic won't be a big issue, but
is that enough to sustain your business?? I've consulted a buddy of mine
from college who actually developed himself AOL's Instant Messaging
system awhile ago and has since moved to business side of AOL (now with
Advertising.com as a senior executive). Here's his take on the investment prospect
on sport social networking website (an unfiltered email reply :-) :
"Hey guys! Can't believe you think Talid and I were bigger drinkers than you two.... :)
Anyhow from the attached fact sheet, it isn't clear what the business
model is, is just pageviews monetized by ads? If so, the sports
vertical is a pretty good vertical, but by no means the most lucrative
one from an ad $$ perspective since there is a lot of sports page
supply out there. Also user generated content is generally monetized
at a much lower rate than premium editorial content. So its great they
want fans to post unfiltered comments, but most advertisers don't want
to appear next to those comments.
They would have to generate a LOT of page views to make substantial
money in my mind and the field does seem pretty crowded (although I'm
not a sports fan, so I can't really tell). In general I think the
trend is to be more judicious about acquisitions so perspective
acquirers will look a this company's ability to make money, not just
drive traffic.
All in all, based on this, it seems pretty risky to me. Now if you know
the management team and they have a good track record and have done
this before, that could make the difference.
Hope this helps,
-Eric
READ ERIC's BIO
An alternate business model is to create these small and cool software that enhances the user-experiences at these already-established social networking sites (Facebook and MySpace...etc), such as Widget, Fun Wall, Travel Map, or even the Poll that I've used on this blog.
You initially offer them for free but come back with a paid subscription offer for more sophisticated
product or service.
For all you sport-entrepreneurs out there, your first and foremost responsibility is to MAKE MONEY!
If you just have a ton of ideas to make a really cool website, you should be a marketer, not
an entrepreneur. You may be able to create a social networking website or any other
form of UGC with absolutely off-the-charts contents, but if you don't know how to convert
them to PROFITS, you will be recognized as everything else BUT a successful entrepreneur.
Don't lose sight of the fact that, as an entrepreneur, you are out there to make money
for yourself first and foremost. If you want to do the "right thing" while making a lot of
money, you might bump into several ethical as well as cultural hurdles along the way.
Think of it this way - philanthropy will come once you have money.
In my opinion, being a successful business person and a successful entrepreneur is
completely separate. You can be the most successful Chief Marketing
Officer ever at Pepsi Co and enjoy your luxury-box perks at the Super Bowl
but you'll never be called an entrepreneur. By the same token, you may be
squeezed into a coach seat on a 15-hour flight to Hong Kong and selling
the next innovative shoe strings that nobody knows about, but at the end of the day,
if you're making more money than what you used to in a corporate cubicle,
you've succeeded as an entrepreneur.
There are GREAT IDEAS and then there are GREAT IDEAS THAT MAKE MONEY
- the difference is night and day...
Recent Comments